(Blocked)
mfranks/Mike (345)
|
|
|
from sancak/Sancak (91) 
on October 15, 2005 8:31:59 PM CDT
(-1)
next time, pls try to take a shoot without flash so it will make it more natural..
|
 |
|
|
Jennifer #8
(5)
gkendall/Gregory (844)
|
|
|
from sancak/Sancak (91)
on August 14, 2005 4:59:44 PM CDT
(1)
your DOF is very good. the frame is fine for wholeness. If i look at the shadows, the time of photograph made some problem. The floor light make everything worse here. Her white dress is a natural reflector for her. It needs to be taken 2 hours later maybe..:) Nice shot! .
|
|
|
|
Jenn
(2)
gkendall/Gregory (844)
|
|
|
from sancak/Sancak (91)
on August 14, 2005 4:50:16 PM CDT
(-1)
Yes, Let's say the table is a bad chance. Taking the model into the frame totally and removing the table from there will make hit photo 3 thumbs. Please for me, take same photo there without the table. I think if you can hold the camera below, it will make it better. without table! :)
|
|
|
|
(O)(O) Portrait Of A Young Photog At Work
(14)
time20n/Timothy (6,590)
|
|
|
from sancak/Sancak (91)
on August 14, 2005 7:06:33 AM CDT
(0)
I always love to take photos of the photographers when they take photos. It is intresting moment for me. This little girl is in really different frame. Here the camera is not focusing something.It seems the little girl was focusing sth there. There is problem here. It is because of Timothy(the owner of the photo. The little girl hadnt hold the camera perfectly. She needs to improve it. But you should give her an SLR camera. It is the time! Maybe you should have changed...
|
|
|
|
Angel ?
(26)
thc/Franck (5,389)
|
|
|
from sancak/Sancak (91)
on August 13, 2005 1:34:51 PM CDT
(0)
I read all critiques, just one of them says there is a problem. HOwever we cant critique the photos here on framing, composition etc. Actually we can, but little bit respect. you dont have any chance to understand what photographer felt while you took the photo. The part of this critique is subjective. If you critique the photo technically, it depends on what photographer has equipments. In this photo, yes there is a problem about lighting. If this is a studio shot (means...
|
|
|
|
Behind It
(3)
apprentice/Ömür Deniz (968)
|
|
|
from sancak/Sancak (91)
on July 31, 2005 6:04:58 PM CDT
(0)
Polarize will not work here exactly. UV makes a little bit different, however you will cause losing the emotion. on forehad, there is a constrictive reflection there. So my a new angle may have chosen. Next time remind your model(this little boy) same pose. And never forget, the Polarize filters are not used here.It will affect your EV under that kinds of light value with this color temp. Thank you for sharing again..
|
|
|
|
Looking for something
(4)
apprentice/Ömür Deniz (968)
|
|
|
from sancak/Sancak (91)
on July 31, 2005 5:49:22 PM CDT
(1)
Not really , the similarity of the colors made frame distinctive. It is not our business to make a choice the FRAME on your creations. I cant evaluate this photo without EV values.. a little problem on DOF. But it seems that you used your tele zoom 100-300mm objective (its attention not on you) and f/stop is about 5.6, not smaller, so the cat is out of your AF point. As you know your CCD doesnt have a succesful intelligent. Keep on using your MF mode. So my suggestion? Get...
|
|
|
|
(Blocked)
staden/Art (637)
|
|
|
from sancak/Sancak (91)
on May 19, 2005 7:12:50 PM CDT
(1)
I dont suggest you reflector. I dont prefer it, not at this frame. No low light or no high light anywhere. This picture just needs a little bit sun light, not directly! You may have taken a few step and gone away from shadow zone :) This is always a problem for digital cameras. White balance! The cameras sometimes doesnt understand however you use the right color temparature. Emily is like a pro model here. Please Ask her if she can be my pro model for one shot, it will be...
|
|
|
|
Swing to hope
(2)
apprentice/Ömür Deniz (968)
|
|
|
from sancak/Sancak (91)
on May 16, 2005 5:41:13 PM CDT
omur, we see how we can shot the macro with a mid-wide angle lens. If you can catch it via higher f/stop.. maybe f/4 or sth.. your subject would had more sharpness here. it seems to me it was "villager girl".. hope to see your next macro shot with your other lens( sth says you had already one from inside of me.) good light.Sancak
|
|
|
|
Resting on green...
(9)
apprentice/Ömür Deniz (968)
|
|
|
from sancak/Sancak (91)
on May 16, 2005 5:39:49 PM CDT
(6)
omur, we see how we can shot the macro with a mid-wide angle lens. If you can catch it via higher f/stop.. maybe f/4 or sth.. your subject would had more sharpness here. it seems to me it was "grass".. hope to see your next macro shot with your other lens( sth says you had already one from inside of me.) good light.Sancak
|
|
|
|
Handsome
(3)
apprentice/Ömür Deniz (968)
|
|
|
from sancak/Sancak (91)
on May 9, 2005 4:57:12 PM CDT
hahaha! lovely Omur. I remember this dog. He became your model? 300mm,f/5,6 aperture , made him a model. He is rreally looking at you. We see here, your 100-300mm lens has a wonderful sharpness quality. As i said before, im looking to see your photos with an "L" lens.. When your friend is ready, let s take it via an 1,4 wide angle lens :)) Cya
|
|
|
|
Blue Sky
(3)
pieter/Pieter (762)
|
|
|
from sancak/Sancak (91)
on May 8, 2005 10:05:14 PM CDT
I am looking at this photographer's photos which taken with a Sigma! Actually it is a suprise, I wish to see this picture by using an L lens..They are a little bit better
|
|
|
|
Infrared
(7)
pieter/Pieter (762)
|
|
|
from sancak/Sancak (91)
on May 8, 2005 10:02:11 PM CDT
(1)
Actually, I will not write a critique for this image. I couldnt believe when i saw it was from an F717 Sony! Very dangerous colors for Sony f717. How did you do that with it? you know this job. hope to know the exif..
|
|
|
|
Landing Mallard
(5)
pieter/Pieter (762)
|
|
|
from sancak/Sancak (91)
on May 8, 2005 4:54:48 PM CDT
(1)
Pieter+ Canon 1D MarkII + "L f/2.8" + "duck who is Pieter's model" = Wonderful :) Here, I liked the color of water. this duck is not handsome :) I really wonder Raw format of this photo..
|
|
|
|
Sunrise Swan
(9)
pieter/Pieter (762)
|
|
|
from sancak/Sancak (91)
on May 8, 2005 4:38:32 PM CDT
(3)
is it your model? it seems to me, you paid money for this shot? :)good timing really. Focusing point is different area! however all is good. nice shot..
|
