Critiques
This photo currently has 9 conforming critiques.
Since there are already at least three conforming critiques, if you write a conforming critique for this photo, then you will receive only the usual one critique point every time another user rates your critique helpful.
Write a critique
If you find one of these critiques especially helpful--or especially unhelpful--then please take a moment to register your opinion by clicking one of the buttons to the right of the critique.
|
|
from luispereira/Luis (3,074)
on July 17, 2003 1:36:55 PM CDT
(1)
Very beautifull image as all your images, very poetic soft and sensual, great composition and a fantastic light and texture.
Reply
Show ratings
|
 |
|
 |  |  |
|
|
from reschitz/Werner (1,004)
on June 3, 2003 9:08:23 AM CDT
very good, smooth photo. i like the unsharpness and the crop of it. this photo is much more erotic than houndereds of full focus and bright pics. ciao, werner
Reply
|
 |
|
 |  |  |
|
|
from recalcitrantlemming/Matthew T. (2,226)
on February 25, 2003 1:03:10 AM CST
(2)
You've got some work to do here...and if you take the time to extend your creative juices and rethink some of your technical choices, this will move beyond the realm of "interesting composition" and into the genre we like to refer to as Fine Art. There is a lot to be said for the way you chose to crop and the basic elements of this photo. This is a fine example of minimalism. Your DOF and your lighting, however, do not enhance the photograph to its fullest potential. You've still done very well, though.
Reply
Show ratings
|
 |
|
 |  |  |
|
|
from andreachiozza/Andrea (667)
on February 12, 2003 12:33:31 PM CST
(2)
la foto è intrigante ed allusiva, proverei a tagliarla un po' a dx. l'effetto soft non è male, ma mi pare un poco forzato, il gold sul b/w potrebbe risaltare un poco di +. ciao
Reply
Show ratings
|
 |
|
 |  |  |
|
|
from pgama/Paulo (10,664)
on February 12, 2003 9:42:09 AM CST
(1)
Agree with Andrea.
Reply
Show ratings
|
 |
|
 |  |  |
|
|
from oly/Andrea (3,510)
on February 12, 2003 9:40:51 AM CST
(1)
interessante, però secondo me ha poco contrasto.
Reply
Show ratings
|
 |
|
 |  |  |
|
|
from sibheen/Sibheen S. (2,391)
on February 12, 2003 9:37:54 AM CST
(2)
Maria :) I see your idea behind very well! And I love grainy prints. In this case you lose too much texture and therefor information for the eyes. I have the impression of schallow focus instead of stark grain. You also might consider a different crop. Play around with it - I suppose you have a series of this subject?
Reply
Show ratings
|
 |
|
 |  |  |
|
|
from petec/Pete (543)
on February 12, 2003 9:35:15 AM CST
(1)
Maria I agree with Dave on this the shot needs more depth of field. The idea is good as is the composition. The use of light was well done as well.
Reply
Show ratings
|
 |
|
 |  |  |
|
|
from 61501.v1/Aaron (3,279)
on February 12, 2003 9:33:29 AM CST
(1)
un peu flou,domage la lumiere semble superbe,
Reply
Show ratings
|
 |
|
 |  |  |
|
|
from davetaz/Dave (5,635)
on February 12, 2003 9:31:54 AM CST
(1)
Maria, this is too out of focus to me. I like the pose and cropping though. Seems as though the DOF is too shallow as well. Keep shooting!!
Reply
Show ratings
|
 |
|
Comments
Comments are different from critiques. Comments carry no rating, you may write more than one comment per photo, and you may comment on your own photos. If you want to rate this photo, then you should write a critique instead.
Add a comment
There are no comments on this photo.
Return to photos
|