Critiques
This photo currently has 12 conforming critiques.
Since there are already at least three conforming critiques, if you write a conforming critique for this photo, then you will receive only the usual one critique point every time another user rates your critique helpful.
Write a critique
If you find one of these critiques especially helpful--or especially unhelpful--then please take a moment to register your opinion by clicking one of the buttons to the right of the critique.
|
|
from marsel/Marsel (79) 
on January 10, 2006 5:33:00 AM CST
(2)
This is an interesting picture with good contrast. As Anton said earlier, maybe it would have looked better rotated, but this is a matter of artistic taste. Otherwise, the composition is impeccable.
Reply
Show ratings
|
 |
|
| | |
|
|
|
from uccemebug/Michael (1,983)
on October 15, 2002 10:07:42 AM CDT
(1)
[updated 2002/10/27]
Interesting photo from a creative technique.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from amaters/Anton (488)
on September 6, 2002 3:42:48 AM CDT
(1)
Personally i would have rotated this photo. I keep turning my head to see the building in a standing position. It is a nice sharp picture and the faing effect is great.
Please have a moment to look at my building at night.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from jjp1st/Jianping (610)
on August 15, 2002 9:43:26 PM CDT
(0)
very clear night shot. though the composition is not so nice.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from pjo/Pasi (78)
on July 29, 2002 10:28:12 AM CDT
(0)
Abstract like an alien spaceship could be.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from halfvastproductions/Carl (53)
on March 27, 2002 1:44:32 AM CST
(1)
Absolutely awesome!! Great perspective and composition. Brilliant idea, and the angle really does make all the difference.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from markjay/Mark (411)
on March 26, 2002 10:30:19 PM CST
(0)
Very interesting. However, I still keep wanting to see this image as a vertical.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from alenka/Alenka (3,539)
on March 12, 2002 12:07:03 PM CST
(2)
The angle makes all the difference. Novel and impressive.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from 2535.v1/Mark (22)
on March 12, 2002 11:31:44 AM CST
(1)
Exposure is terrific! Was this digitally enhanced at all?
As for the composition, I like the perspective of the building coming from the side of the image, rather than the bottom, as most would shoot a building. Personally I would like more building and less black space, but I appreciate the slightly out-of-symmetry perspective of the building itself.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from mellyk/Melly (273)
on January 27, 2002 5:43:25 PM CST
(1)
Interesting perspective I like it!
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from jlpstickit/James (384)
on January 14, 2002 3:31:37 AM CST
(2)
Slick. A neat building and a good exposure, but the clever bit (this is the clever bit, see) was posting it sideways. A simple tweak, but it makes a rather ordinary picture vertiginous and interesting.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from misterchippster/Chip (2,914)
on January 9, 2002 12:42:45 PM CST
(4)
What a need abstract picture Kenneth! I like it a lot! Nice printing and composition. I like it as it is but just for comparison I would like to see what it would look like with the building taking up more of the frame. I think the circle windows are really cool, reminds me of a giagantic connect four game. Great job!
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
Comments
Comments are different from critiques. Comments carry no rating, you may write more than one comment per photo, and you may comment on your own photos. If you want to rate this photo, then you should write a critique instead.
Add a comment
There are no comments on this photo.
Return to photos
|
