Critiques
This photo currently has 24 conforming critiques.
Since there are already at least three conforming critiques, if you write a conforming critique for this photo, then you will receive only the usual one critique point every time another user rates your critique helpful.
Write a critique
If you find one of these critiques especially helpful--or especially unhelpful--then please take a moment to register your opinion by clicking one of the buttons to the right of the critique.
|
|
from saffersteve/Stephen (39) 
on September 29, 2011 11:03:47 AM CDT
Nope... Fail
Reply
|
 |
|
| | |
|
|
from mbgregor/Randy (233)
on March 8, 2011 3:32:08 PM CST
(3)
If in fact this is a photograph, i.e. a record of light shining onto a surface, which I doubt it is, then the only interesting thing about it is how such a saturated blue was achieved against a perfectly black background.
If, as I suspect, it's a Photoshop or some drawing program scrawl, then it takes even less talent. Either way, it's not much to look at.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from legoland/Russ (84)
on October 28, 2009 5:38:31 PM CDT
This is just bad.
Reply
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
from judekinkopf/Leanne (321)
on August 11, 2009 10:20:40 PM CDT
(-1)
Some of these people need to stop being so negative. It's abstract, so what? I love it!
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from yungreef/Mustafa (32)
on February 6, 2007 2:56:26 PM CST
(0)
Ilike this picture too, its very abstract. You must of used a pretty slow shutter speed, keep it up. Its GROOOVY MAN.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from viciouspasta/Alison (6)
on August 23, 2006 8:59:25 PM CDT
(-1)
I don't care what some of these people say about this, I think this is awesome. Psychadelic and very nice work :)
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from skanner30/Steve (181)
on August 4, 2006 2:38:37 PM CDT
(3)
Lol, Im gonna stop takin photos and get my crayons out too! Surly someone moderates the photos sent into photoSig? If not i think there needs to be, this is one of a few "Artists?" that use this site as a sounding board which is y i usually say nothin. Above is (just) better than my 2 year old can do with a mouse on mspaint, any moderators, or admin gonna take a stand, or do we just wade through dross now?
Just my opinion :)
Skanner30
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from limiteded/Ed (2,391)
on April 28, 2006 12:55:46 AM CDT
(-3)
Wow! People are still jumping on this after more than three years. You've achieved something. It looks to me that all of our judgments here are made on assumptions. Some assume it was made totally in Photoshop. It's just as reasonable to assume that it was painted with light in front an open camera lens. Not knowing which, but knowing that Jette works with photos, and submitted this as a photo, the balance of the scant evidence indicates that it is a photo. From there, it all gets subjective. My subjective opinion as an artist is that it is an interesting form, with both discipline and freedom. That doesn't mean it's my favorite kind of art. But the cutting edge of critically acclaimed art photography embraces works I like even less. And, if they saw that, the negative critics here would swallow their tongues! :-)
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from nnimaa/niMA (170)
on April 21, 2006 11:35:00 AM CDT
May be we should write it PHOTOsig not photoSIG
Reply
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
from ianian/Jan (6)
on April 20, 2006 5:46:18 PM CDT
Great DOF ;D
Reply
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from rnh/Rob (57)
on March 24, 2006 10:04:10 PM CST
(-3)
Simple and effective- i would love to know more details of this shot. I would have no problems hanging this on my wall. It has a certain 70's feel to it.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from fromberlin/Christian (247)
on March 5, 2006 9:01:51 AM CST
(3)
I see a lot of these pictures from my children. I have in most cases to say "nice".
Sometimes my son tells me what he wanted to do whith all this lines and poppy colours. Than i can understand that it is only technical limited.
This picture is not sharp, not interesting and i can not jump in the spiral, because it is in my vie very unstructured.
I don't like it.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from jeffrau/Jeff (844)
on January 10, 2006 1:20:21 AM CST
(4)
it is ntohing, not a photo, its photoshop, get it off here. stop waisting my time on this BUl(s)hit
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
From cessna1967/Mike (2,857)
on March 30, 2006 12:22:27 AM CST
i agree w/your comment, but you don't need to add simulated swearing for enhancement. stay professional. works much better.
Reply
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from fluxylady/Brendan (323)
on December 4, 2005 10:35:50 PM CST
(3)
Yeah, this "photo" pretty much totally sucks. Don't get me wrong, I can appreciate some intersting, simple, modern stuff, but this doesn't even come close to qualifying. Try putting down the etch-a-sketch, and picking up a camera.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from joncoot/Ali (228)
on June 14, 2005 8:55:10 PM CDT
(11)
Did you do this in MS Paint ? I saw a painter elephant in tv and he does better paintings with his proboscis.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from kronikfiend/Stevie (650)
on May 9, 2005 2:12:31 PM CDT
(8)
This is seriously pathetic.. im sorry but i could have done that with my toes in paint if i wanted to.. it has no thought looks more like a joke to me
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from silkscreened15/T And (358)
on December 16, 2003 12:36:06 AM CST
(8)
this is boring to look at, i think. maybe the process of making it was more interesting than the result itself. isn't this just a jumble of blue lines without context or flow? the title "abstraction" certainly doesn't provide much insight.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from ffalth/Fredrik (319)
on December 18, 2002 7:31:01 AM CST
(6)
Use a camera next time, please.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from alainaster/Alain (11)
on October 27, 2002 8:20:24 AM CST
(9)
This is really self indulgent!
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from savad/Mike (67,553)
on October 16, 2002 9:02:45 PM CDT
(12)
though this sounds insulting, it really is - to me. this has got to be one of the silliest things i've seen you post up here. it's not even a scan of your paintings. it's a scribble done in paint. it doesn't offend, who could hate blue? but sorry - perhaps it would be nicer if you photograph something in real life, something abstract and post that. i can scan in a scribble. heck, i can scribble in photoshop and upload that. show us the talent!
---Mike Savad
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from 4361.v1/Will (6,193)
on September 30, 2002 12:24:03 AM CDT
(-6)
Simple and effective.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
From warpdrv10/Robert (553)
on October 10, 2003 3:36:40 AM CDT
Eight thousand plus critiques/557 pages and you think this is a perfect "photo". Scary.
Reply
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from ninin/Franco (27,713)
on September 29, 2002 1:19:37 PM CDT
(-6)
Great abstract Jette! More abstract than this is not possible! Ciao, Franco.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from fdormoy/Franck (1,561)
on September 28, 2002 3:53:46 AM CDT
(-6)
It seems that you show you are more a painter than a photographer...
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from maxpower/Max (22,588)
on September 27, 2002 11:20:36 PM CDT
(-4)
good color and contrast.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from kiwinick/Nick (2,140)
on September 27, 2002 7:59:35 PM CDT
(-5)
simple shot well done.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from bizzielady/Patricia (6,703)
on September 27, 2002 7:16:09 PM CDT
(-3)
I think I did this once...it's called physiographs., right? I'm guessing you used a hanging flashlight, colored gel and setting on bulb with a timed exposure. Email me and tell me if I'm 'warm'. Actually, you did a good job to get this much 'design' to it.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from saltydogv1/deleted (652)
on September 27, 2002 6:57:59 PM CDT
(4)
Blue spaghetti right ?
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from docstephan/Stephan (14,342)
on September 27, 2002 6:56:40 PM CDT
(-7)
it's not my style but very well done !!
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
Comments
Comments are different from critiques. Comments carry no rating, you may write more than one comment per photo, and you may comment on your own photos. If you want to rate this photo, then you should write a critique instead.
Add a comment
|
From dp1969/Dwayne (0)
on December 3, 2006 5:28:33 PM CST
Amazing! And I am not referring to the photo or the subject, it is to the optically challanged "group" who give this drivel credit. Why don't I just get out the airbrush tool and scribble some crap on a black background, why actually look for something incrdible in the world to shoot when you can scribble on a kids toy. For all the disparaging comments I see from the "experts" here on some photos that actually deserve accolades, they instead give them to this "photo".
Perhaps these same folks would buy the contents of my trash can if I call it art too.
Reply
|
|
From arjen/Arjen (20,271)
on October 26, 2008 6:58:36 AM CDT
Come on, man! The content of the trash can, that's an old one. Fernandez Arman did that in 1960. Neo-dada, for your information. You can view it in the Kaiser Wilhem Museum in Krefeld if you want. This piece looks more like abstract impressionism to me.
Reply
|
|
Return to photos
|
