Critiques
This photo currently has 2 conforming critiques.
If you write one of the first three conforming critiques for this photo, then you will receive three critique points every time another user rates your critique helpful.
Write a critique
If you find one of these critiques especially helpful--or especially unhelpful--then please take a moment to register your opinion by clicking one of the buttons to the right of the critique.
|
|
from pautov/Yuri (16,515) 
on May 28, 2012 3:37:21 AM CDT
(2)
Agree with Mehrdad, Suchit! I think thank using bigger number of F-stop could make more of details (you have a lot of them!) of his dress in focus. You have a good background - so no need to separate by DOF...
As for my critique - I am not sure about your model's expression and the way he is looking at. On one hand it seems he's looking into the camera - on another a bit lower... His mouth (kind of smile) comes into contradiction with absance of so called crow's feet near eyes...
But agree - 2TU! Thank you,... Yuri
Reply
Show ratings
|
From suchit/Suchit (24,349)
on May 28, 2012 7:48:30 AM CDT
Good point Yuri, as I wrote to Mehrdad, I didn't want the background (wall) to be in focus. The room was very small and the dancers were preparing for their performances so had to work quickly. As for the expression, he is a bit shy in nature and the lady dancers were kind of teasing him. That's why the partial smile (and lack of crow's feet I suppose which could also be due to make up).
I must agree that you have very beautiful women in Voronezh, Russia, and we do have a few handsome but shy men here in India. :-)
Reply
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from mojaveh/Mehrdad (52,739) 
on May 28, 2012 1:29:15 AM CDT
(2)
Dear Suchit, this is nice portrait. Quite sharp in the middle and has a good DOF.
I just have two suggestions:
1- Light reflection on his forehead is a bit high. Selectively adjust it.
2- A bit loser DOF would make more of him in focus.
But anyway these are minor flaws and it can get strong 2TU.
Cheers, Mehrdad
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
From suchit/Suchit (24,349)
on May 28, 2012 7:06:55 AM CDT
Thank you Mehrdad. I agree with both your valid points. My reason to go with a very shallow DOF was that this was a tight room and I didn't want the background (wall) to be in focus.
Reply
|
|
|
|
Comments
Comments are different from critiques. Comments carry no rating, you may write more than one comment per photo, and you may comment on your own photos. If you want to rate this photo, then you should write a critique instead.
Add a comment
There are no comments on this photo.
Return to photos
|
