Landscape


You are viewing a reduced-resolution thumbnail. You must have an account and be signed in to view photos greater than 72 hours old.

Photo

Title     Landscape
Photographer     basiri1962/Masoud (444) Send mail to this user
Portfolio     Masoud Basiri
F-stop     f/5.6
Shutter speed     1/250 sec
Categories     Cityscape
Landscape
Sky
Digital back/sensor     ccd
Filter     UV
Lens     28-200
Camera     NIKON
Content advisory     G (general audiences)
Submitted     May 23, 2012 3:16:34 PM CDT
Views     236
Rating     3 Thumb-up

Critiques

This photo currently has 3 conforming critiques. Since there are already at least three conforming critiques, if you write a conforming critique for this photo, then you will receive only the usual one critique point every time another user rates your critique helpful.

Write a critique

If you find one of these critiques especially helpful--or especially unhelpful--then please take a moment to register your opinion by clicking one of the buttons to the right of the critique.

Show newest first    Show most helpful first
Show oldest first    Show least helpful first

Thumb-up    from guddu21/Gurbinder (565) Send mail to this user on May 23, 2012 7:26:07 PM CDT (1) Early critique

Hello Masoud, I agree with both critiques, the image is too soft and what is the composition about, that situation should have captured very well, colors in sky and clouds were nice. The one thing I see in this image what could make a good photo is silhouette of tree (about 1/5th of image's left and center of 1/3rd of that 1/5th part) if you had range to capture. My best regards!!!

Reply  Show ratings 

Thumb-up    from roxxie2013/Roxxie (840) Send mail to this user on May 23, 2012 5:45:18 PM CDT (1) Early critique

Solid 1TU deserved for the effort and idea invested. But idea realized didn't proove right.

I have been here back in my first steps. I learned that silhouette works only agains evening sky (from sunset to the limits of available light in the sky). Even the golden hour, which you had in volumes here, cannot explain reason for keeping the lower part in total dark. Doesn't seem natural depite the fact that's the way cameras do.

You might have been challenged with the angle of light or maybe you had light resolved at wrong angle, not against the clouds you obviously had in mind to shoot. Whatever the reason, spectator's sight falls below the line and clouds remain unattended. That is probably against you intentions.

Keep trying. One hour later, for starters.

Reply  Show ratings 

Thumb-up    from almasi/Sinisa (1,148) Send mail to this user on May 23, 2012 3:31:36 PM CDT (1) Early critique

I do not know exactly what you want to display with this photo. huge clouds or silhouettes of trees? in any case it would make a good crop of the photo above the clouds. then the photo looked a bit better but still would not know anything. I looked at your other photos in the gallery, and all are ok. I believe that this little lack of inspiration. 1T for the effort. Greetings! Sinisa

Reply  Show ratings 

From basiri1962/Masoud (444) Send mail to this user on May 24, 2012 7:11:41 AM CDT

I tried the shade of trees and dense clouds show. Thanks

Reply 

Comments

Comments are different from critiques. Comments carry no rating, you may write more than one comment per photo, and you may comment on your own photos. If you want to rate this photo, then you should write a critique instead.

Add a comment

From robertwallis/Robert (12,866) This user is a Premium Member Send mail to this user on May 23, 2012 4:37:08 PM CDT

Dforget to writemore critiques. With 13 photos and 5 critiques you are behind what is expected of everyone to return critiques to the community. The expectation is 3 crits returned per photo posted. Thanks in advance.

Reply 

Return to photos