Critiques
This photo currently has 3 conforming critiques.
Since there are already at least three conforming critiques, if you write a conforming critique for this photo, then you will receive only the usual one critique point every time another user rates your critique helpful.
Write a critique
If you find one of these critiques especially helpful--or especially unhelpful--then please take a moment to register your opinion by clicking one of the buttons to the right of the critique.
|
|
from ilchacal/Peter (4,499) 
on May 21, 2012 9:34:53 AM CDT
(1)
Great urbex shot Wilco. The composition is good, and the subject matter interesting. The light coming in through the window is a little blown out. Perhaps one more bracket shot 1-2 stops lower would have helped. I would also bump up the contrast a bit, to give the scene an even more gritty feel.
Reply
Show ratings
|
From kwintar/Wilco (241)
on May 21, 2012 1:51:14 PM CDT
Thank you. Actually, I did a version of this picture where the light coming from the windows was a less blown out, but I felt like it was a distraction. You could very clearly see what was behind the window, and were focused on that instead on the rest of the frame...
Reply
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from stmv/Sebastian (59,822) 
on May 21, 2012 9:04:33 AM CDT
(2)
very nice shot, feel like it needs about a foot more space toward the front, I read somewhere how photographers cannot resist decay, and this is a perfect example, simple life of a nun, most priests do not live so sparse their whole life.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
From kwintar/Wilco (241)
on May 21, 2012 9:15:09 AM CDT
Thanks. I agree with your critique. One step back however, and the door would also be in the shot. I am saving for a wide-angel lens though...
Reply
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from ted27/Ted (41,282)
on May 21, 2012 8:26:40 AM CDT
(2)
You do realize Wilco that this image has zero(0) chance of making the cover of Architectural Digest magazine. But, your perfect technique could land you the cover image if you train your lens elsewhere. I find this image interesting in that there is a fireplace as well as a radiant heating system, both in this small room??? And yes your HDR is perfect as is all else pertaining to this shot. Yeah, I know 3TU for trash, but hey, this is perfection even if it ain't a beautiful nude or swimming duck... Very nice (not the house cleaning service though ha ha). >TED
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
From kwintar/Wilco (241)
on May 21, 2012 8:36:42 AM CDT
Thanks. I think the fireplace has not been used for a while, since it's an old building and the fireplace is closed off. And yes, I also think a beautiful nude it the frame would make it perfect, but my colleague wouldn't take his clothes off ;-)
Reply
|
|
|
From ted27/Ted (41,282)
on May 21, 2012 8:51:16 AM CDT
ha ha... not a true friend, well then put a duck on the bed??? >TED
Reply
|
|
|
|
Comments
Comments are different from critiques. Comments carry no rating, you may write more than one comment per photo, and you may comment on your own photos. If you want to rate this photo, then you should write a critique instead.
Add a comment
|
From bartbonk/Bill (22,938)
on May 21, 2012 8:55:04 AM CDT
Oddly, On my iPad the photo comes up rotated an additional 90 degrees CW from normal. Bill
Reply
|
|
From kwintar/Wilco (241)
on May 22, 2012 6:07:37 AM CDT
I've checked, I also get this on my Ipad. I have done some initial editing on my Ipad, and for some reason the portait/landscape modus has been screwed up. But when I transferred it to my PC, I thought I had fixed the issue. Apperently, the landscape/portrait modus of the image is still saved (for Ipad/Iphone views) even after uploading it to PhotoSig...Strange...
I will upload another version of this image later with all the extra Exif info removed, to see if that fixes the issue.
Reply
|
|
Return to photos
|
