Critiques
This photo currently has 4 conforming critiques.
Since there are already at least three conforming critiques, if you write a conforming critique for this photo, then you will receive only the usual one critique point every time another user rates your critique helpful.
Write a critique
If you find one of these critiques especially helpful--or especially unhelpful--then please take a moment to register your opinion by clicking one of the buttons to the right of the critique.
|
|
from photoroberto/Roberto (60) 
on May 7, 2012 8:59:26 PM CDT
excelente trabajo de HDR,me gusta la composicion, colores, texturas, opino que si es HDR debe notarse que lo es. unico detalle es el plano horizontal, podrias rotar un poco para lograr la horizontalidad en la imagen, al hacer esto la verticalidad tambien se corrige por supuesto. gracias por compartir.
Reply
|
 |
|
| | |
|
|
from jacopods/Jacopo (31)
on May 6, 2012 1:46:05 AM CDT
(2)
Beautiful colors, but the tonemapping really flattens everything up, and makes the bottom portion of the picture a bit confusing. Also, as other people said, the sky is really too strong and ends up distracting the viewer.
Finally, you might want to adjust the picture a bit (perspective, rotation) have a look at the right margin, the corner of the building is definitely not vertical. The church and the Trajan column on the left are also off-vertical, although that is less obvious.
I like the 1:1 aspect ratio.
Thanks for sharing
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from ufuksandalci/Ufuk (1,739)
on May 5, 2012 12:51:35 PM CDT
(5)
So colorful and attractive city scene. Since people were not blurred, I suppose this is more of a tone mapped image?. Yes the sky did not benefit so much from HDR and even a flatter (but blue) sky would be nice for this eye-catching photo. Overall when the sky is corrected, this is a very nice photo to print large. Regards.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from timr/Tim (2,520) 
on May 5, 2012 11:40:20 AM CDT
(5)
This is a great scene rich in detail and color.
The sharpness of the earthbound components is good, halos are absent, a nice hdr treatment. The sky, though, is a distraction and overpowers the rest. The clouds have chunky halos, and the contrast creates bright whites that draw the eye from the central subject.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from jaypix/Jean-Pierre (28,492)
on May 5, 2012 11:04:07 AM CDT
(4)
HDR is a bit too obvious here, the sky and its clouds are not in keeping with the light on the monument; that said, good cropping and nice colours.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
Comments
Comments are different from critiques. Comments carry no rating, you may write more than one comment per photo, and you may comment on your own photos. If you want to rate this photo, then you should write a critique instead.
Add a comment
There are no comments on this photo.
Return to photos
|
