Fireworks

Critiques

Write a critique

If you find one of these critiques especially helpful--or especially unhelpful--then please take a moment to register your opinion by clicking one of the buttons to the right of the critique.

Show newest first		Show most helpful first
Show oldest first		Show least helpful first

		from amacrae/Alan (9,150) on April 12, 2012 6:55:55 PM CDT (2) This is a different, and refreshing, perspective on fireworks, Gilad. Great start on a good idea! I think I would open up the frame a little bit. Cheers, Alan Reply  Show ratings  From go/Gilad (2,290) on April 13, 2012 10:52:37 AM CDT Thanks Alan. Going through your photo collection I can see that you are pretty experienced with such shots. I'll examine them more closely before taking another set (which is going to be soon). -Gilad Reply
		from jduckett/John (4,215) on April 12, 2012 5:28:25 PM CDT (5) Fireworks are bright, colourful, vibrant things. This image is none of those. Your exposure time was just long enough to get some trails, but the image would have been more dramatic with longer trails from a longer exposure. Your choice of aperture has resulted in underexposure and a dull, lifeless image. Reply  Show ratings  From go/Gilad (2,290) on April 12, 2012 5:47:42 PM CDT Thanks John for you point of view. This shot was one of many that I took the other night. Longer exposures resulted in brighter and more vibrant images but at a cost. As the sky was saturated with fireworks there was much smoke in it. This reflects light from the fireworks and decreases considerably the contrast. Reply  From jaygheiser/Jay (10,361) on June 9, 2012 9:50:40 AM CDT No matter what the circumstances, it still is not an interesting picture. If there's too much smoke, then maybe it was too late in the fireworks show to continue with photography. Reply

Comments

Add a comment

There are no comments on this photo.

Return to photos