Critiques
This photo currently has 2 conforming critiques.
If you write one of the first three conforming critiques for this photo, then you will receive three critique points every time another user rates your critique helpful.
Write a critique
If you find one of these critiques especially helpful--or especially unhelpful--then please take a moment to register your opinion by clicking one of the buttons to the right of the critique.
|
|
from farradhim/Jacline (43,542)  
on April 22, 2011 6:48:52 PM CDT
(2)
I think this version is more to the point, showing the moon and some clouds, maybe some far away stars too, colors are bolder also, a improved version, I would say, of this moon image
Jacline
Reply
Show ratings
|
 |
|
| | |
|
|
|
from vettri/Jayavel (7,103)
on April 22, 2011 5:12:14 PM CDT
(2)
Hi Andres, Gothic moon is one my fav photo of yours. Nice to see another version of it. In one way, I like this version more. The moon looks more abstract. Colors are also vivid in this one. But the discontinuous rust line at the bottom which is missing here, fails to give that landscape feel. The triangle at the BRC is distracting and compositionally, TLC looks vacant. Overall, it is a nice experience appreciating and documenting small changes over time.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
From acampos/Andres (51,987)
on April 22, 2011 5:17:07 PM CDT
Hello Jayavel. Thank you so much for your kind words and for your detailed critique. You are right about the line at the bottom. When I found it again I didn't took a wider view. Fortunately, this motive is one block for my place of work. So, as soon as the light is optimal I will take it again. About the triangle at the BRC... well I don't know how is that I miss that. I will be careful next time :-) Thank you again and take care - Andres.
Reply
|
|
|
From vettri/Jayavel (7,103)
on April 24, 2011 1:48:29 AM CDT
BTW, isn't also interesting to note the difference in responses for these kinds of pics over 3 years?
Reply
|
|
|
From acampos/Andres (51,987)
on April 24, 2011 12:43:07 PM CDT
It is. The response at that time was intensive and I have the impression that at that time more people were interested in abstracts. Also abstract members were more active at that time that they are now... I think. This is not necessarily a bad thing, on the contrary the community at PhotoSig change all the time and with it the subjects of interest.
Most of the people that wrote critiques to the first version are not active since a while. So, it is, the motive in the picture has change a lot and so the critics and their critics... that in biology is called evolution :-) Regards - Andres.
Reply
|
|
|
|
Comments
Comments are different from critiques. Comments carry no rating, you may write more than one comment per photo, and you may comment on your own photos. If you want to rate this photo, then you should write a critique instead.
Add a comment
There are no comments on this photo.
Return to photos
|
