Critiques
This photo currently has 3 conforming critiques.
Since there are already at least three conforming critiques, if you write a conforming critique for this photo, then you will receive only the usual one critique point every time another user rates your critique helpful.
Write a critique
If you find one of these critiques especially helpful--or especially unhelpful--then please take a moment to register your opinion by clicking one of the buttons to the right of the critique.
|
|
from petercharlesfagg/Peter Charles (1,970)
on January 6, 2011 1:20:35 PM CST
(0)
Hello again Harold. This time I would like to suggest that for my eyes there is too much watery foreground. I like the framing with the boughs! Many regard such framing as chocolate boxy but making a frame for something as large as the Tetons stops the eye wandering away. I agree with Alex about the brightness of the mountains but I suppose that it is another of those post processing things that is difficult to adjust, I have very little knowledge of editing programmes! The Grand Tetons are one of the wonders of the earth that I shall never see with my own eyes, so it is always a pleasure to view such things through the eyes of others and the camera. Thankyou for posting an interesting image, Peter.
Reply
Show ratings
|
 |
|
 |  |  |
|
|
from ciragephotography200/William (734)
on August 1, 2010 10:53:13 PM CDT
(2)
Using a tree bow to frame an image is a very basic technique to create perspective. I know wedding photographers who carry a realistic artificial bow in their trunk in case there is no vegetation at the location. But in this case, it is my opinion that the aspens are too much of a good thing. It says to the viewer, do not enter, not to mention that on part of them the focus is soft. Landscapes typically require three elements, the near, middle, and far. I'm sure it was beuatiful to be there and this photo records that you were there. Thanks for sharing.
Reply
Show ratings
|
 |
|
 |  |  |
|
|
from sst67/Alex (5,378)
on August 1, 2010 10:43:39 PM CDT
(2)
I like the foreground framing in this photograph. But, there is just too much picture to make the photograph effective. Also, it seems a bit too bright.
Reply
Show ratings
|
 |
|
Comments
Comments are different from critiques. Comments carry no rating, you may write more than one comment per photo, and you may comment on your own photos. If you want to rate this photo, then you should write a critique instead.
Add a comment
There are no comments on this photo.
Return to photos
|