Critiques
This photo currently has 1 conforming critique.
If you write one of the first three conforming critiques for this photo, then you will receive three critique points every time another user rates your critique helpful.
Write a critique
If you find one of these critiques especially helpful--or especially unhelpful--then please take a moment to register your opinion by clicking one of the buttons to the right of the critique.
|
|
from rrayfield/Robert (53,676)
on November 3, 2009 5:32:02 AM CST
(4)
Great mood, Hadi! A bunch of technical thinks. First, the photo is a bit flat. Try Levels at 50 - 1.17 - 255 to provide just a bit of an edge - see what you think. Second, I don't know how sharp the original image is - but I had that lens and it wasn't ever as sharp as I expected. For portraits, if you are on a budget, Canon makes a very good 50mm f/1.8. And the frame? I think I would notice the pink without it. Cheers, r
Reply
Show ratings
|
From hadiwibawa/Hadi (113)
on November 3, 2009 5:36:08 AM CST
Thanks robert for your input.
i tried the level u suggest, yes it was better thanks
as for lens, the baby would not stand still she kept crawling around, and my studio is so small so 50mm will not cover all.
again thanks
rgds
hdw
Reply
|
|
From rrayfield/Robert (53,676)
on November 3, 2009 5:44:54 AM CST
hmm . . . I use the Canon 17-85 IS - a fabulous lens but expensive. It took me a year to convince myself to get rid of the 18-55. (The newer Canon comes with a better lens.)
Reply
|
|
From hadiwibawa/Hadi (113)
on November 3, 2009 6:34:09 AM CST
actualy i prefer tamron 17-50/f2.8, color tends to be yelowish, but its very sharp...
at that moment my tamron was on service center
Reply
|
|
From rrayfield/Robert (53,676)
on November 3, 2009 6:36:37 AM CST
Ah, that's good. I am glad that you have a good lens! And the f/2.8 can be useful to soften the backgrounds. Cheers, r
Reply
|
|
 |
|
Comments
Comments are different from critiques. Comments carry no rating, you may write more than one comment per photo, and you may comment on your own photos. If you want to rate this photo, then you should write a critique instead.
Add a comment
From greeter1/Administrator (0)
on November 3, 2009 8:04:13 AM CST
A reminder that Photosig's recommendation is three conforming critiques per photo submitted. This helps Photosig achieve its goal of three critiques for every member's photos. Photosig needs members like you, on a continuing basis, to write three critiques for other members for every photo you submit. Please, can you spend some time writing critiques for other members? Thank you.
Reply
|
Return to photos
|