Critiques
This photo currently has 9 conforming critiques.
Since there are already at least three conforming critiques, if you write a conforming critique for this photo, then you will receive only the usual one critique point every time another user rates your critique helpful.
Write a critique
If you find one of these critiques especially helpful--or especially unhelpful--then please take a moment to register your opinion by clicking one of the buttons to the right of the critique.
|
|
from therisod/Stefano (43) 
on May 20, 2008 5:30:51 AM CDT
(1)
I feel I would like to see a little bit more of the trees on the top or crop a little bit the water on the picture bottom.
Stefano
Reply
Show ratings
|
 |
|
| | |
|
|
|
from muunal/Umit (6,763)
on May 20, 2008 2:28:42 AM CDT
(1)
Hi Sezai, this is an excellent capture. The flowing water looks silky. Good colours, sharpness and composition. Thanks for sharing. Umit
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from fandries/Franky (1,938)
on May 19, 2008 10:42:03 AM CDT
(3)
A few years ago i was also there but sad for me i did'nt had the knowledge then to take such pictures.Today i wouldn't be a problem but anyway about your photo ;GOOD COMPOSITION AN USE OF LIGHT, aND GREAT COLORS.vERY GOOD WORK.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from picturethat/JASON (53)
on May 19, 2008 6:57:52 AM CDT
(4)
Fully agree with all so far. Excellent use of shutter speed and lighting. The light on the trees in the background is very warming, yet the water being darker looks very cold! I also feel that more on top would make this a definate 3 thumbs up! Well done.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from siroliver5/Kresimir (1,221)
on May 19, 2008 6:28:27 AM CDT
(4)
Lovely composition, and I very much like the choice of shutter speed here. Did you have to use GND filters (or post-process differently) to maintain the detail in the background trees?
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from keysoze/Mark (608)
on May 18, 2008 3:10:03 PM CDT
(6)
A perfect choice of shutter speed to allow a sense of movement in the water as it falls over the edge, but not too low a speed to destroy the detail in the water as it broils at the bottom.
A nicely composed image as well.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from baba/David (36,949) 
on May 18, 2008 2:53:12 PM CDT
(5)
The contrast the warm trees in the background and the blue water is nice. I kind of wish there was more on top. If the issue was a bright sky, then a neutral density gradient for the sky would help with that issue. I think you really found a wonderful vantage point of the falls. I especially like the left side with the water falling in a different orientation to the rest of the falls.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from dtolson/Dennis (1,694)
on May 18, 2008 2:47:01 PM CDT
(6)
Not just another waterfall photo. Here, I think you have aced it! I'm not normally a big fan of the soft/silky look of cascading water, but your technique in this picture is superb and really works well in my opinion. The muted colours of the background folliage nicely complement the lighting, colour and texture of the water in the foreground. Bravo! Regards.....Dennis
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from guyot/Michel (10,696)
on May 18, 2008 2:37:21 PM CDT
(6)
Far above the average level of this kind of shots (silky water in evening light), this one reaches an absolute perfection IMO. I'm particularly impressed by your exposure, with still rich details in the brightest areas Composition rather classic, but the feeling to be 'in the water' provided by the lower left angle is an attractive addition. Congrats, Michel
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
Comments
Comments are different from critiques. Comments carry no rating, you may write more than one comment per photo, and you may comment on your own photos. If you want to rate this photo, then you should write a critique instead.
Add a comment
There are no comments on this photo.
Return to photos
|
