Fallen ii


You are viewing a reduced-resolution thumbnail. You must have an account and be signed in to view photos greater than 72 hours old.

Photo

Title     Fallen ii
Photographer     tinypunkee/Tanya (683) Send mail to this user
Portfolio     Infrared
F-stop     f/4
Shutter speed     15 sec
Categories     Emotive
Landscape
Nature
Filter     Hoya R72
Camera     Canon 20D
Format     RAW
Content advisory     G (general audiences)
Submitted     April 21, 2006 2:53:01 AM CDT
Views     341
Rating     2 Thumb-up

taken in florida...after wilma.

even though the tree was knocked down, the leaves continue to grow....

Critiques

This photo currently has 2 conforming critiques. If you write one of the first three conforming critiques for this photo, then you will receive three critique points every time another user rates your critique helpful.

Write a critique

If you find one of these critiques especially helpful--or especially unhelpful--then please take a moment to register your opinion by clicking one of the buttons to the right of the critique.

Show newest first    Show most helpful first
Show oldest first    Show least helpful first

Thumb-up    from richardseal/Richard (2,535) Send mail to this user on April 21, 2006 3:54:36 AM CDT (1) Early critique

Hi Tanya - I'm a big fan of IR shots and this is another nice one. The blur has already been mentioned, but there isn't much you could have done about that, also I think that it adds an old feel to the shot which I like. My main problem is the tilt, a small rotate in PS would make it look much better I think. The reflections are nice too. Thanks for sharing.

Richard.

Reply  Show ratings 

Thumb-up    from gmariusica/Marius (5,297) Send mail to this user on April 21, 2006 3:07:46 AM CDT (1) Early critique

Hi Tanya, why did you exposed so much this photo(15sec)? good enough composition but still you can improve it next time then I can say that you have to get off that little branch from the top left side.I don't know why but looks a little bit blur, the sharp is mising here.

Reply  Show ratings 

From tinypunkee/Tanya (683) Send mail to this user on April 21, 2006 3:16:59 AM CDT

hello, thanks for the critique.

the exposure is so long because the filter i used was completely opaque.

hence, the blur is caused by the wind.....

Reply 

From gmariusica/Marius (5,297) Send mail to this user on April 21, 2006 3:27:43 AM CDT

O! I seeee

Reply 

Comments

Comments are different from critiques. Comments carry no rating, you may write more than one comment per photo, and you may comment on your own photos. If you want to rate this photo, then you should write a critique instead.

Add a comment

There are no comments on this photo.

Return to photos