DASHA


You are viewing a reduced-resolution thumbnail. You must have an account and be signed in to view photos greater than 72 hours old.

Photo

Title     DASHA
Photographer     pochitalin/Dmytro (1,796) Send mail to this user
Portfolio     PORTRAITS
Categories     Nature
Portrait
Paper     Kodak Professional
Camera     Lubitel 166B
Content advisory     G (general audiences)
Submitted     August 5, 2005 3:21:14 PM CDT
Views     2,545
Rating     11 Thumb-up

comments are wellcome!

Critiques

This photo currently has 5 conforming critiques. Since there are already at least three conforming critiques, if you write a conforming critique for this photo, then you will receive only the usual one critique point every time another user rates your critique helpful.

Write a critique

If you find one of these critiques especially helpful--or especially unhelpful--then please take a moment to register your opinion by clicking one of the buttons to the right of the critique.

Show newest first    Show most helpful first
Show oldest first    Show least helpful first

Thumb-up    from loopi2k/Sarah (55) Send mail to this user on March 28, 2006 3:45:45 PM CST (2)

yes i agree with the white edging on the bottom right corner and i would of liked he face to be a bit lighter, i feel her face need lifing slightly perhaps with a gold reflector but apart from that its beautiful and i'd love to know what film was used

Reply  Show ratings 

Thumb-up Thumb-up Thumb-up    from holden/Deian (2,286) Send mail to this user on November 6, 2005 7:01:12 PM CST (2)

The only problems that I can point out, only if hard pressed, are that the leaves in front of her hair a tad brighter than they should be. Other than that, it is an amazing portrait!

Reply  Show ratings 

Thumb-up Thumb-up    from digiography/Grant (10,506) Send mail to this user on August 5, 2005 5:06:52 PM CDT (4) Early critique

Beautiful model, the lighting is wonderful, love the sheen on her neck. I would of liked to see the same photo with a little reflected light on her face just to see if that would be and improvement, but like Charles says the lighting her might work better. Excellent capture.

Reply  Show ratings 

Thumb-up Thumb-up    from cbeauche/Charles (5,544) Send mail to this user on August 5, 2005 3:32:51 PM CDT (9) Early critique

Yes, the lighting is very special in this photo. Subject is backlit but you managed to pull out the details in the shadows. Backlighting is causing the eyes of the model to look less alive though (no catchlight). I like the square format, but I would have removed the little white triangle in the bottom-right corner. Great work!

Reply  Show ratings 

Thumb-up Thumb-up Thumb-up    from larcombe/Tony (122) Send mail to this user on August 5, 2005 3:25:15 PM CDT (5) Early critique

I love it, the lighting is perfect. You have that dark shading on the left and at the top that really brings your attention to the girl. She looks perfect, her skin and eyes are wonderful. Some people may say that the face maybe should be a little lighter but I'm a big fan of moody lighting, love it.

Reply  Show ratings 

Comments

Comments are different from critiques. Comments carry no rating, you may write more than one comment per photo, and you may comment on your own photos. If you want to rate this photo, then you should write a critique instead.

Add a comment

From 7klive7/Clive Alexander (0) Send mail to this user on May 10, 2006 8:20:38 PM CDT

I love this portrait, especially the lighting, it has a oily, creamy texture to it. I don't agree with having more light on the subjects face it would have killed the effect for me. In fact changing anything would have spoiled it, and made it into a totally different picture.

Reply 

From fioletov/Natan (0) Send mail to this user on February 6, 2007 10:08:49 AM CST

too much PS.

Reply 

Return to photos