Lynx Spider 5mm


You are viewing a reduced-resolution thumbnail. You must have an account and be signed in to view photos greater than 72 hours old.

Photo

Title     Lynx Spider 5mm
Photographer     narler/Nigel (942) Send mail to this user
Portfolio     Spiders
F-stop     f/16
Shutter speed     1/60 sec
Categories     Animal
Nature
Macro
Scanner     Epson Perfection 2480 Photo
Lens     Super Takumar 55 mm
Camera     Asahi PENTAX Spotmatic SPII
Format     35 mm negative scan
Film     Konica ISO 100
Content advisory     G (general audiences)
Submitted     March 10, 2005 2:26:24 AM CST
Views     321
Rating     5 Thumb-up

Lynx Spider

Incase any details get lost here's what I used

SETTiNGS
- F-Stop....: 16 ( This is lens minimum )
- Shutter...: 1/60 ( This is fastest flash sync )

EQUiPMENT
- Camera...: Asahi Pentax Spotmatic II
- Lens.......: SMC Takumar F2/55mm
- Macro.....: 50mm Extension tube, 2x Teleconverter
- Flash......: GN16 rated (only have 1 flash unfortunately)
- Tripod.....: No. Hand held shot.

SUBJECT
- Name.....: Lynx Spider
- Size.......: body length is 5 mm
- Ratio......: This photo represents 2x lifesize on 35mm negative

Distance to Subject
- from lens: 70 mm

Modifications & Editing
- None direct scan from 35mm negative at 2400dpi.
- only resized and saved as JPEG to conform with PhotoSig requirements.

About Me
I like photographing wildlife (mainly spiders and insects) as the only way to truely appreciate them is to see them upclose.

Please before you critique, please check out my profile page, but basically I'm only interested in the art of photography, so the most constructive comments for me are those on how to improve my photographic skills with the camera. NOT those which are used to improve the photo in photoshop ( image manipulation, imho has nothing to do with photography )

Storing photos in the digital realm is not my main objective. using slide film is.

Thanks for looking and reading.

Critiques

This photo currently has 3 conforming critiques. Since there are already at least three conforming critiques, if you write a conforming critique for this photo, then you will receive only the usual one critique point every time another user rates your critique helpful.

Write a critique

If you find one of these critiques especially helpful--or especially unhelpful--then please take a moment to register your opinion by clicking one of the buttons to the right of the critique.

Show newest first    Show most helpful first
Show oldest first    Show least helpful first

Thumb-up Thumb-up    from hank008/Henry (651) Send mail to this user on March 22, 2005 1:24:03 AM CST (3) Early critique

Like the spider, I think a little bit further back might help but like you've mentioned these shots tend to happen fast. Might I suggest one of those silly flash diffusers that attach with velcro. I use one with my Nikon FE2. It looks silly but when I angle the tilt or adjust the zoom on the flash it allows me to change the light and it can remove any hint that you're using flash. Of course the FE2 has TTL flash and that helps alot.

Reply  Show ratings 

From narler/Nigel (942) Send mail to this user on April 2, 2005 9:05:10 AM CST

Hi,

Thanks for the information. With the diffuser does it help by reducing the flash intensity and therefore also reducing the intensity of the shadow thats cast by the flash? If yes then I may look at doing that.. Thanks.

I'll still endeavour to use 2 flashes though to help remove shadows all together, it's just an issue of cost and configuration that I have to overcome first.

Thanks for taking the time to comment on my photo.

Regards
Nigel.

Reply 

From hank008/Henry (651) Send mail to this user on April 6, 2005 1:43:40 PM CDT

With the TTl flash metering I never have to worry about to much light. The gear does that for me. The diffuser does soften the shadows quite a bit, I've took shots where it was hard to tell flash was used. ( take a look at my shots of Wilma and Betty my two cats, it was used on them.) When I used this setup on my FM (no TTL) I found I had to experiment and yes adjust the power level of the flash. It definatly was in my best interests to bracket my exposures.

Reply 

Thumb-up    from wpb/Pat (1,033) Send mail to this user on March 10, 2005 2:52:55 AM CST (3) Early critique

Not a bad photo of a spider. Compositionally, I would like the spider to be in the left part of the frame. The surface the spider is on is kind of busy and bright on the left, but it compliments the spider. In lieu of another flash, you could get a little white card and place it at an opposing angle to the flash, which would help fill in shadows. The spiders nicely in focus, but the photo is a little soft which is probably due to it being resized not having any unsharp mask applied, since you said you were against manipulation in Photoshop. However, I'm sure the original slide was sharper, so I'd hope thats something you'd be willing to do to make it more pleasing to display.

Reply  Show ratings 

From narler/Nigel (942) Send mail to this user on March 10, 2005 4:37:03 AM CST

Thanks for the comments.

I would have liked to frame it a little better and/or have found a specimen on a different surface, but at all times I photograph the subject where it was found and as the lynx spider is a rover it's not always still long enough to setup and frame exactly as I'd like.

A card, mirror or reflective surface the other side would have helped but I'd be out of hands as this photo was taken hand held.. no tripod, so 1 hand for focus and one holding the camera / shutter activation, I'd need an assistant :) for anything else.

Oh I forgot to add to the description that I also used a 2x teleconverter, so that may have also impacted on sharpness slightly.

Reply 

Thumb-up Thumb-up    from otelo/Kirk (352) Send mail to this user on March 10, 2005 2:45:28 AM CST (4) Early critique

Great macro shot! Also the background is a good choice. I only have two suggestions: 1. better sharpness 2. the face area is too dark, a reflection panel or fill light would have avoided that. thanks for sharing!

Reply  Show ratings 

From narler/Nigel (942) Send mail to this user on March 10, 2005 4:41:10 AM CST

Thanks.

I'm not sure if the sharpenss issue is due to the scanner I use, or if a dedicated neg scanner would yield better results, or it could be a result of the teleconverter, or the distance to subject vs hand held.

The background is where I found the spider, as I always try and photograh the subject where it was found and with as little disturbance as possible, it was just lucky (or well chosen by the spider) that it blended in so well.

I wish I could have removed the shadow from the face and I'm looking into getting another bracket to mount an additional flash to help fillin sections like that.

Thanks for the comments.

Reply 

Comments

Comments are different from critiques. Comments carry no rating, you may write more than one comment per photo, and you may comment on your own photos. If you want to rate this photo, then you should write a critique instead.

Add a comment

From akaluke/Luke (1,656) Send mail to this user on March 13, 2005 10:15:21 PM CST

Possible to bounce the flash of a ceiling?

Reply 

From narler/Nigel (942) Send mail to this user on April 17, 2005 9:08:49 AM CDT

Hi, Thanks for the thought, but this shot was not indoors.

Reply 

Return to photos