Critiques
This photo currently has 16 conforming critiques.
Since there are already at least three conforming critiques, if you write a conforming critique for this photo, then you will receive only the usual one critique point every time another user rates your critique helpful.
Write a critique
If you find one of these critiques especially helpful--or especially unhelpful--then please take a moment to register your opinion by clicking one of the buttons to the right of the critique.
|
|
from choiboyogg/Andrew (682) 
on December 14, 2002 3:52:57 AM CST
(0)
the room is a bit spooky because it is so empty yet it feels like the room is still filled with some entity. it draws me closer because the mystery of the room makes me wonder about the history of the room. i want to know what has happened in this space. as far as technicality goes, i feel that the window is overexposed and the blinding light is distracting. you should burn that area a bit to uncover the details.
Reply
Show ratings
|
 |
|
| | |
|
|
|
from uccemebug/Michael (1,983)
on October 10, 2002 12:49:34 PM CDT
(0)
updated: 2002/11/22
I quite like this composition, with its delightfully reflective floor and the rich tones throughout. But the 'watermark'! Two are certainly no better than one in this pic...
My apologies for not leaving a comment with my first rating.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from mosack/Robert (204)
on July 17, 2002 7:01:11 AM CDT
(0)
Thats what people call a "photographic eye"!!!
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from 19460.v1/Blake (98)
on July 12, 2002 10:23:56 AM CDT
(0)
this is so.. creepy. i love the atmosphere. the angle and curves are nice too.. great b&w
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from hrvoje/Hrvoje (129)
on July 6, 2002 11:55:41 AM CDT
(0)
Kula lotrscak?
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from 2763.v1/Marc (1,753)
on May 4, 2002 3:57:27 AM CDT
(0)
The only little problem is the over-exposed area in the window, but great composition... and not an easily solved problem, this window... ND Grad maybe. PS would help a bit, but no way to get this back 100%... An exposure set closer to matching the brighter areas could have been interesting too - very dark in the dark, so very moody...
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from suad/Suad Lojic (2,405)
on February 15, 2002 6:26:02 PM CST
(0)
Sve je OK samo ovaj radijator u sredini...brr. Visak je.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from sanhodo/Sandy (525)
on February 5, 2002 6:15:05 PM CST
(0)
Shades of Kafka. Mystery is your middle name. Looks good on my monitor. Very nicely seen. Too bad that you had to put the text in.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from ahriman/Angra (1,109)
on January 27, 2002 4:02:00 AM CST
(0)
Cool. I love geometric shots like this when they are well executed, and this one is. In fact, that flare at the window and the one or two hot spots at the apex of the arch around the window are all that stops me from calling it perfect and giving it a three thumbs up. Superb! One of those pics that just feels instinctively *right* somehow.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from 1067.v1/steve (7)
on January 26, 2002 9:16:17 AM CST
(0)
the shadowing is good but I agree there is too much light from the window. Speaking of the window the reflection is not from the floor, is it?
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from detlefklahm/Detlef (3,827)
on January 19, 2002 7:24:55 PM CST
(0)
if this is not done digitally, did you use a grad filter ? anyhow...this is a nice composition...I love how the diagonal floor design takes you to the window and the wall.
I may have liked this even more without your " trademark" signs in the image..now I am been picky....I also like that you choose a monochrome over colour.....by the way...if you could use a model here....so many ideas I`d have in this great simple setting
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from 325.v1/Linda (769)
on January 18, 2002 12:26:25 PM CST
(0)
One can tell it is not a digital picture, SO? My amature eye likes it except for the too bright glare from the window.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from clhf/Clh (1,838)
on January 14, 2002 4:39:08 PM CST
(0)
Very nice, but then again, I love black and white checkered floors! The image is very artistically sound!
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from clchick/Cl (3,512)
on January 14, 2002 11:29:55 AM CST
(0)
Aw hell, I'll give you a three just because James ran out of his and because this is a great photo.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from andyholder/Andrew (830)
on January 4, 2002 11:00:04 AM CST
(1)
Excellent. Like I said in another critique somewhere, the burnt out bit is good, all part of the overall effect. Really superb.
Andrew
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from jlpstickit/James (384)
on December 18, 2001 1:36:05 AM CST
(1)
Pretty slick, Rick. I'm guessing that somebody somewhere will wish the window weren't glared out quite so much, but it doesn't bother me. I love the ladder going to... what on earth is it for?!? And I want to know what is in that lil cubby hole, it looks so nice to squeeze into. I could do without your logo appearing twice, but maybe that's supposed to be a parallel to the reflected window. Artsy, but still distracting.
You don't get a three... just because. I ran out of em.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
Comments
Comments are different from critiques. Comments carry no rating, you may write more than one comment per photo, and you may comment on your own photos. If you want to rate this photo, then you should write a critique instead.
Add a comment
There are no comments on this photo.
Return to photos
|
