Critiques
This photo currently has 20 conforming critiques.
Since there are already at least three conforming critiques, if you write a conforming critique for this photo, then you will receive only the usual one critique point every time another user rates your critique helpful.
Write a critique
If you find one of these critiques especially helpful--or especially unhelpful--then please take a moment to register your opinion by clicking one of the buttons to the right of the critique.
|
|
from georgesd/George (591) 
on May 2, 2005 6:57:47 PM CDT
(0)
I critiqued one of your photos and i had to take a look at your portfolio. I love it. Very crestive and original.
Reply
Show ratings
|
 |
|
| | |
|
|
|
from sheplee/Shep (49)
on January 20, 2005 4:00:50 AM CST
(2)
Simply OUTSTANDING! Your compositional skills and imagination are in a league of their own. Keep up the great work!
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from knt9152/Georg (11,908)
on August 20, 2004 11:05:32 AM CDT
(3)
It would be very good, if the image was primary only photographic, but also in this case it very much was pleasant to me. Very much effectively looks. (Sorry for my bad Eglish)
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from scottellington/Scott (9,850)
on August 16, 2004 4:07:17 PM CDT
(6)
The apparent convergence of parallel lines of striving toward human perfection lead to the vanishing point of humankind.
I think this image extends Koestler's ghost and Shelley's monster and Jackson's self-concept from the dawn of prehistory clear into tomorrow's news.
Visual analogies, powerful diagonals, devices of composition and value
drive home the stake's butt-end (seen at bottom-right) through the viewer whose search for imperfection (in a mirror) is trasmitted through the transfixed eye of the beheld deep into the heart of the transfixed beholder.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from witalij/Pawel (409)
on August 15, 2004 2:29:26 PM CDT
(3)
Theres really an awesome story to this one. Aand a scary one too. I wonder how it was lit, and how much of the final effect was produced in Photoshop. Really good work.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from galigul/Gal (196)
on August 15, 2004 1:13:21 PM CDT
(2)
let me join to the majority who think that this a heck of a photo - realy one of the best around.
Thumbs up my friend.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
from almog/Almog (171)
on August 15, 2004 9:00:19 AM CDT
jeffery, this pic is one of the best photos in this site.
thank you.
Reply
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from leebarker/Lee (3,864)
on August 15, 2004 6:12:17 AM CDT
(5)
I think the blurred and slightly hazy look of the background is the right choice. This has obviously been done to give the girl at the foot of the image absolute prominence, and it works! I love the dirty gothic industrial ambience, and I especially love the models posture. The composition has real strength, there are no missing pieces in this jigsaw, it is complete perfection.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from cerutti/Cerutti (279)
on August 15, 2004 4:07:32 AM CDT
Absolutely great. I love the compo, the colour, the vision. The expression of the model, the make-up.
All is great
Reply
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from havefaith/Adam (486)
on August 14, 2004 10:08:17 PM CDT
(3)
i'm in love with all of your work to date and this is nothing short of perfection... you really deserve all the good ratings your getting.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from kiaran/Ciaran (102)
on August 14, 2004 10:03:38 PM CDT
(5)
the industrial background is superbly executed, I must say. not sure about the harsh flesh effect. shades of Aeon Flux, but without the drama. too much of your work on the hair. model obviously dropped on top of background.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from angelagraf/Angela (2,611)
on August 14, 2004 7:41:19 PM CDT
(6)
Well done Jeffrey, This montage suits the mood and title. I like the colour as it adds to the atmosphere. Both camera angle shots go well together. Well done and keep up the good work. regards angie
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from blackcat/Luis (26,324) 
on August 14, 2004 7:21:02 PM CDT
(11)
"The Long, Overdue Deletion of the Last, So Called "Flesh Machine""
Naomi Jay is our next Super Heroine coming to life after Catwoman,
Kate Beckinsale .... Selene,
in Underworld, and
Batwoman, among many others.
Excellent "CREATION" of a novel Character of NUMATRIX' s new creation "Flesh Machine". Naomi Jay is awesome and impressive. A great Science Fiction cartoon like Image. Very finely artistic and angrily emotional. Filled with the Rage against the Machine. Could Fit Pink Floyd's The Wall (1982). A Rebel/A Cause/An Adventure. Female Clones as Sex Objects.
Fabulous make up and costume. Excellent Steely background in a future not far from the cyborgs or Robots. A she-I, Robot, rebelling against humans. Jeffery, we already have a heroine now we need a script and then "The Movie". Note: this Image should not be Deleted
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from patrik/Patrik (1,206)
on August 14, 2004 5:15:07 PM CDT
(3)
Hi Jeffrey, Wahooo !!!
What an amazing work so well carried out ! You are obviously a master of digital post-processing. Imho, everything is perfect : sharpness of the model, blurr of the background, "make-up" of the model, dramatic effect of the picture...
Really a good work. Best regards.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from redhotchili/Chris (522)
on August 14, 2004 5:07:34 PM CDT
(4)
great image, great concept, and well executed, but please help me out here, is "Naomi Jay" an anagram of "Michael Jackson"?.....
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from aa2bh55bbe7d68b2ah/Phil (6,879)
on August 14, 2004 4:33:43 PM CDT
(1)
There is some smoke going out of this machine! helas, why is the background so much blurred ? anyway, I like the dramatic sky, the orange-mec girl, the tones.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from jac/Jac (10,078)
on August 14, 2004 4:21:53 PM CDT
(4)
Reminds me of when the Terminator fell through the wormhole, Jeffery. This gal looks like she'd give Arnie a run for his money. Upper arm gives the appearance of airbrushing which seems to be at odds with the 'feel' of the rest of the shot. Otherwise - awesome.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
From numatrix/Jeffery (599)
on August 15, 2004 2:34:14 AM CDT
Nope. No "airbrushing". Just a very highly polished, black latex glove. Thanks. Jeffery Scott (1019)
Reply
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from cmurray/Claude (4,439)
on August 14, 2004 4:14:13 PM CDT
(3)
Jeffery: Holy moly..is what I said when I saw this one. Nice composit and photographic work on the model. She is realy doing a fine job of the flesh machine. Regards, Claude
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from pedroliborio/Pedro (27,739)
on August 14, 2004 4:10:10 PM CDT
(4)
as usual from you quite and amaizing work...impressive the way you join things and the creativity to make us think in things...
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from ummagumma66/Filip (1,950)
on August 14, 2004 4:09:04 PM CDT
(6)
Whoaah, great image and composition.
Only one suggestion: maybe the contrast between the super-sharp foreground and the blurred background is too big.
Regards, Filip.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from llelmoll/Marco (2,995)
on August 14, 2004 4:07:14 PM CDT
(3)
Amazing! But tell me, I'm curious, is this a "collage" of 2 different shots or is this a single exposition? Realy suggetive! Thanks for sharing! M. ps. can you write the dettail of your camera and lens?
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from maico/Gary (25,230)
on August 14, 2004 4:03:30 PM CDT
(6)
Another powerful photomontage in this series. A compelling image with an interesting model pose combined with a gritty industrial scene. Masterful subdued toning. I might like it even better if the background wasn't quite so blurred.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
Comments
Comments are different from critiques. Comments carry no rating, you may write more than one comment per photo, and you may comment on your own photos. If you want to rate this photo, then you should write a critique instead.
Add a comment
|
From rdv/R (1,208)
on August 14, 2004 4:29:34 PM CDT
Is that Michael Jackson?
Reply
|
|
From kiaran/Ciaran (102)
on August 16, 2004 7:28:47 PM CDT
Clearly not. If it were Jacko, it would look less human.
Reply
|
|
Return to photos
|
