Critiques
This photo currently has 5 conforming critiques.
Since there are already at least three conforming critiques, if you write a conforming critique for this photo, then you will receive only the usual one critique point every time another user rates your critique helpful.
Write a critique
If you find one of these critiques especially helpful--or especially unhelpful--then please take a moment to register your opinion by clicking one of the buttons to the right of the critique.
|
|
from jebir/Jens (3,671) 
on September 24, 2003 4:17:33 AM CDT
(1)
Interesting portrait. It conveys an impression to me that the person on the portrait doesn't feel very well. It also makes me feel very sad. Although, I dont like the message, I have to admit it is "Artistically and technically flawless". Regards, Jens.
Reply
Show ratings
|
 |
|
| | |
|
|
from stefanrohner/Stefan (672)
on September 23, 2003 1:12:09 PM CDT
art!
Reply
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from pauldana/Paul (7,326)
on September 23, 2003 8:12:17 AM CDT
(2)
It's a banner day on Photoshop, Seems things are getting better. This is so above most of the stuff here, it's creative, interesting and well done technically. The image has a lot of interest and the expressions on the face are great! Well done!
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from poker/Radoslaw (1,949)
on September 23, 2003 6:43:59 AM CDT
(3)
Marvelous effect... first of all technique used is not so abvious exept multi exposition... but the most importat is final effect that is incredible ! I like it very much . regards
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from davidtavares/David (1,694)
on September 23, 2003 6:30:05 AM CDT
Don't know how you did it but I shure do like it. great photo
Reply
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from tiberiofanti/Tiberio (5,112)
on September 23, 2003 5:59:31 AM CDT
(3)
Ok, great work. Someone (like me) will argue it is rather am artSig work ... but why don't you add some details about how you made it (chemical or digital) and what's your minimal equipment?
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
From jonathankane/Jonathan (5,001)
on September 23, 2003 6:03:08 AM CDT
I did it all with a camera so it's a photo.. photo as in photosig... but thank you!!!!!!
it's digital but to me the image is all that matters not the process so that is why I never discuss that kind of stuff because I don't want it to be about HOW I did it.
Reply
|
|
|
From pauldana/Paul (7,326)
on September 23, 2003 8:10:45 AM CDT
I do think that this is also a learning site and when someone does something as powerful and good as your image it would be nice for those of us who want to learn more about photography to understand how it was done. WE might want to try it too! And, you are right, how it was done and whether it was in camera, darkroom, or photoshop should not matter for critiquing but might help people beacause if I don't have PS or a darkroom then I know I can't emulate certain photos etc. Good stuff!
Reply
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from tea/Edas (417)
on September 23, 2003 5:57:03 AM CDT
shot of the week on photosig!
for me ofcouse
Reply
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from rdv/R (1,208)
on September 23, 2003 5:49:26 AM CDT
(3)
Nice picture Jonathan, looks like the beast inside a tree, very scary, but not sexy :) ...really nice...cannot think about anything to make it better...keep on going...Ruud
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
Comments
Comments are different from critiques. Comments carry no rating, you may write more than one comment per photo, and you may comment on your own photos. If you want to rate this photo, then you should write a critique instead.
Add a comment
|
From wojson/Wojciech (1,030)
on September 23, 2003 5:23:08 AM CDT
Looks like Paradise Lost's album cover. Very nice work, but I'd prefer to
see some other face or maybe some other expression there... Sadness instead
of surprise.
Reply
|
Return to photos
|
