Business
12,357 discussions
103,804 replies
Photos & Photographers
19,723 discussions
92,293 replies, 3 new
Technique
4,558 discussions
34,276 replies
Equipment
8,909 discussions, 1 new
63,135 replies, 5 new
photoSIG Talk
7,221 discussions
80,485 replies
User News/Ads
1,718 discussions
21,616 replies
photoSIG News
484 discussions
5,406 replies
photoSIG Cafe
4,101 discussions, 2 new
57,211 replies, 9 new
Critic's Corner
1,327 discussions
16,794 replies
Start a new discussion
|
From ktb/Robert (136)
on April 4, 2012 9:11:54 AM CDT
Hello!
I wanted to know is such a photo can be considered as abusing the dead.
Please tell me you opinion, and write critic to the picture!
http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=2522311&forward=user
Read 308 times
Reply
|
From marshall/Marshall (11,954)
on April 4, 2012 9:47:53 AM CDT
Please note: this photo is emphatically NSFW. Click on it at your own risk. Or better yet, click on it when you're not at work.
Reply
|
|
From karin2007/Karin (19,610)
on April 4, 2012 10:35:22 AM CDT
As you are trying to get opinions on your image here is mine: I am not offended by your photo, I don't think you are abusing the dead, but I do find it tasteless
Reply
|
|
From ericnla/Eric (1,496)
on April 4, 2012 11:29:24 AM CDT
To me, it seems like it was done for the shock value alone. Nothing erotic here, if that was your intent. 'Abusing the dead?' Huh? Silly.
Reply
|
|
From robertwallis/Robert (12,897)
on April 4, 2012 2:17:25 PM CDT
*I'm not sure where the "abusing the dead" notion comes from unless you
are referring to the bear skull clamping down on the penis. The bear is long past caring about any sort of abuse. Either the human penis has been Photoshopped or it's had some strange history, but it looks as though there are two urethas. If you want more critiques, write some more critiques. In this case, drawing an analogy longer is better. Too many of your critiques are nonconforming.
Reply
|
|
From onajourney/Chris (1,260)
on April 4, 2012 9:42:01 PM CDT
After reading the comments above....I'm not even going to peek at it. Sorry.
Reply
|
Return to forum
|