Business
12,357 discussions
103,804 replies
Photos & Photographers
19,723 discussions, 1 new
92,293 replies, 4 new
Technique
4,558 discussions
34,276 replies
Equipment
8,909 discussions, 1 new
63,132 replies, 10 new
photoSIG Talk
7,221 discussions
80,485 replies
User News/Ads
1,718 discussions
21,616 replies
photoSIG News
484 discussions
5,406 replies
photoSIG Cafe
4,101 discussions, 2 new
57,211 replies, 9 new
Critic's Corner
1,327 discussions
16,794 replies
Start a new discussion
|
From donschaeffer/Don (12,842)
on April 2, 2012 9:01:24 AM CDT
I need clarification about the "rate the critiques" scale. What does this mean and why are the managers so concerned that we use it? If I rate the critique as "unhelpful" I get an immediate response from management telling me to remove the unhelpful rating. If I don't rate the critique and it remains neutral, I'm told to please rate the critique. It seems the only acceptable behavior is to rate everything helpful (even when I don't feel that way). What is the point of a rating scale if only one rating is acceptable. Please clarify.
Read 293 times
Reply
|
From donschaeffer/Don (12,842)
on April 2, 2012 10:22:19 AM CDT
Sorry Sheena. I know that the ratings are useful. It's the ones that don't say much that I obect to. Some people seem to go around looking for things they don't like.
Whenever I rate a critique with the "no opinion" rating I get a request asking me to rate the critiques.
Your job must be very tough. I don't want to make it tougher.
Reply
|
|
From donschaeffer/Don (12,842)
on April 2, 2012 11:09:13 AM CDT
I didn't look them up. I think "this is a little bit dull" doesn't warrent 2 TDs. But ok. I guess I'm burned by a whole series of TD ratings lately. No offense intended to anyone.
Reply
|
|
From del/Administrator (0)
on April 2, 2012 12:05:28 PM CDT
Don, have you made a monitor, camera, or software change in the past few months? I looked at your submissions back to late last fall and many appear to me noisy and pixellated due to possibly over-sharpening or over-zooming (cropping too small a segment, not sure there is a technical name for this). I once had a six megapixel camera (you mentioned you use one in a reply) and it was fine, clear and sharp, unless I cropped down too far. A change or degradation in monitor crispness could cause you to sharpen more that you should without noticing the extent. Some of yours would have noise that would only be noticed by pixel peepers, and I am not concerned about that, but many have noise and artifacts noticeable to my naked eye.
Del
Reply
|
|
From donschaeffer/Don (12,842)
on April 2, 2012 4:25:16 PM CDT
I moved to NY and changed to a laptop (Dell Latitude D600). But I've always had criticism for oversharpening and noise.
Reply
|
|
From donschaeffer/Don (12,842)
on April 2, 2012 6:39:31 PM CDT
Thanks for not speculating on my move. I have the equipment I can afford.
Reply
|
Return to forum
|