Forums

The Rules

in photoSIG News
Business
12,357 discussions
103,803 replies
Photos & Photographers
19,730 discussions, 2 new
92,343 replies, 17 new
Technique
4,561 discussions, 2 new
34,316 replies, 27 new
Equipment
8,914 discussions, 1 new
63,163 replies, 5 new
photoSIG Talk
7,225 discussions
80,509 replies, 1 new
User News/Ads
1,718 discussions
21,617 replies
photoSIG News
485 discussions
5,407 replies
photoSIG Cafe
4,106 discussions, 3 new
57,289 replies, 71 new
Critic's Corner
1,330 discussions, 1 new
16,820 replies, 5 new

Start a new discussion

From sheenawilkie/Administrator (0) This user is a Premium Member This user is an Administrator Send mail to this user on January 28, 2011 1:07:06 AM CST

Please note the new tab on the main menu called Rules. Before anyone gets excited, there are no new rules. Some people find the TOS vague and difficult to understand, and some users have said that they are unsure of what is or is not allowed. For that reason, we've simply documented the rules we've been using for years.

Every effort has been made to express these rules as clearly and concisely as possible, because we want everyone to be able to follow them without any doubt about what is required. This will mean less work for us in enforcing the rules, and less worry for you about running afoul of them. In short, total peace and harmony (That's not too much to hope for is it?).

If you find any of the rules less than perfectly understandable, please send me an email.

Read 1,406 times

Reply 

From olmosfamily/Enrique (42,863) This user is a Premium Member Send mail to this user on January 28, 2011 1:24:27 AM CST

Oh, shucks, you took away the Chat function.

Just kidding.

Cheers, Rick.

Reply 

From adam/Adam (855) This user is a Premium Member Send mail to this user on January 28, 2011 1:27:24 AM CST

Don't worry, it's still there, under Users :-)

Reply 

From olmosfamily/Enrique (42,863) This user is a Premium Member Send mail to this user on January 28, 2011 1:40:36 AM CST

Worry? Hadly ever used it, Adam. Just joshing with Sheena. Cheers, Rick.

Reply 

From tvernuccio/Sheila (37,110) This user is a Premium Member Send mail to this user on January 28, 2011 1:41:50 AM CST

Looks great, Sheena! :)

Reply 

From lurchi/Ulrich (61,692) This user is a Premium Member Send mail to this user on January 28, 2011 6:20:53 AM CST

Clear and simple. Good work!

Reply 

From hankbenson/Hank (52,511) Send mail to this user on January 28, 2011 9:06:48 AM CST

Better and clearer. Not a big thing, but making the "Rules" type-face larger than what's used in the other tabs makes it seem over-emphasized. It's now easy enough to see without that.

Reply 

From rgordley/Rich (6,980) This user is a Premium Member Send mail to this user on January 28, 2011 9:19:46 AM CST

Considering how many times the admins have to chide people who think Psig should be their own playground with their own rules, I think making the type-face larger is appropriate.

Reply 

From sheenawilkie/Administrator (0) This user is a Premium Member This user is an Administrator Send mail to this user on January 28, 2011 9:23:39 AM CST

The larger font has been done for over emphasis since it's a new tab and we want to draw people's attention to it. It is temporary. Thanks for noticing it and providing a sig learning moment :-)

Reply 

From log/Louise (27,203) This user is a Premium Member Send mail to this user on January 28, 2011 10:12:33 AM CST

Heh.... you could have it bright red, flashing, and bouncing up and down making "click me" noises, and there'll still be people who don't see it....

Reply 

From sheenawilkie/Administrator (0) This user is a Premium Member This user is an Administrator Send mail to this user on January 28, 2011 10:14:54 AM CST

>^.^<

Reply 

From oledk/Ole (5,332) Send mail to this user on January 28, 2011 1:38:29 PM CST

Great clarifications. Thanks Sheena.

Reply 

From olmosfamily/Enrique (42,863) This user is a Premium Member Send mail to this user on January 28, 2011 5:09:14 PM CST

Short, clear and to the point. You couldn't have said it better. Cheers, Rick.

Reply 

From jroessler/John (14,282) This user is a Premium Member Send mail to this user on January 28, 2011 5:22:24 PM CST

Great idea actually. This should/could possibly save you untold hours of keyboard labor. On the other hand how often do people actually go read the manual until all else fails. :o)

Reply 

From smalincik/Stefan (550) Send mail to this user on January 28, 2011 6:02:00 PM CST

For honest and fair people, these rules are obvious, because this behavior in everyday life. For the crooks need to invent rules and laws to be violated again and again ....

Reply 

From sheenawilkie/Administrator (0) This user is a Premium Member This user is an Administrator Send mail to this user on January 28, 2011 7:32:29 PM CST

The rules won't be violated time and time again. We'll give people a couple of chances and then show them the door.

Reply 

Return to forum