Business
12,184 discussions, 3 new
102,446 replies, 8 new
Photos & Photographers
19,471 discussions, 3 new
88,066 replies, 49 new
Technique
4,147 discussions, 4 new
30,705 replies, 38 new
Equipment
8,325 discussions, 5 new
58,645 replies, 38 new
photoSIG Talk
6,870 discussions, 1 new
76,563 replies, 5 new
User News/Ads
1,686 discussions
21,526 replies
photoSIG News
387 discussions
4,253 replies
photoSIG Cafe
3,368 discussions, 5 new
47,349 replies, 58 new
Critic's Corner
984 discussions
13,454 replies
Start a new discussion
|
From sarahbecker/Sarah (378)  
on November 6, 2009 10:02:45 AM CST
Is there a way to remove the glare from eyeglasses in Photoshop? I'm having huge problems with this. I know it's best to not wear the glasses or pop the lenses out, but too late for that. Any suggestions are greatly appreciated!
Thank you,
Sarah
Read 125 times
Reply
|
From mikishots/Scott (4,219)
on November 6, 2009 10:10:52 AM CST
If the glare is minimal and has a simple background in the area, it may be possible with some magnified work - there will be no automated action for this, it's cloning work. But as you've said, it's too late. Best to use a polarizer or make sure that the glass face is at an angle to the lens next time, especially if you're using a flash.
Reply
|
|
|
From del/Administrator (0) 
on November 6, 2009 10:10:54 AM CST
Not a good or easy way. Best use for these photos is to print them small, turn them into keychains, and attach them to your camera as reminders to remove the glasses or, just as simple, turn the head until the glare is gone. Sorry I can't help with your immediate problem, perhaps others have had better luck than me. I have done it, but I have never been satisfied or happy with the results. Best advice I can give is do your work in a duplicate layer and save the layers. You will feel even worse if you flatten too soon and find that you have ruined the original.
Del
Reply
|
|
|
From sarahbecker/Sarah (378)
on November 6, 2009 12:09:57 PM CST
Laughing about the keychain remark because you are so right! I have tried and tried and am not pleased with any of the results. I just didn't know if there was some simple solution that I was overlooking. At this point I'm think a reshoot is in order. Thanks for your help!
Reply
|
|
|
From jroessler/John (7,435)
on November 7, 2009 9:30:38 AM CST
Matt works for NAPP and generates a number of their training courses. He is a very practical practitioner. I'm referring to the first link Wayne put up.
Reply
|
Return to forum
|
